Frank, I'm responding to you on my own site because although I'm very grateful to 911blogger.com and enjoy participating there still in some ways, I don't like to argue unpopular points there now. I don't enjoy making an effort and then have my work hidden. I'd be very happy to continue this conversation with you here or somewhere else. Also, I'm willing to go on the phone with anybody for private and/or recorded conversations regarding the Truth Movement. I think we should all be facing each other directly, privately. and publicly now. Text is too time consuming at least for me on this. Audio is the way to go, I think.

regarding this:
Frank Legge - "911ARTISTS, by asking for an example you appear to be of the belief that CIT has not lead witnesses. In most cases we do not know about this because we were not present before the interviews to hear what was discussed. We do note however that a number of witnesses gave accounts to CIT years later that were somewhat different from the accounts they gave shortly after the event. There is one case however in which we can hear Craig letting the witness know that there were other witnesses who contradicted his position. This applies pressure to follow the lead of the other witnesses. It has been well established by psychological experiments that witnesses have a tendency to reject their own observation in favour of conflicting assertions. The witness in question was Albert Hemphill. After a long period of discussion which was not producing the results Craig wanted he informed Albert that other witnesses had provided evidence that the plane was on a path too far north to have done the observed damage. To his credit Albert did not budge. He insisted that the plane came "over his right shoulder" over the bridge and "straight" into the Pentagon. When asked whether the plane would have been as far south as the VDOT antenna tower, Albert said "That would be a little too far". Given that he said the plane flew straight, he is a south path witness. It is important to note that CIT claim him as a north path witness, thus they spread false information."
http://911blogger.com/news/2011-01-01/joint-statement-pentagon-david-chandler-and-jon-cole#comment-247263

specifically this:
Frank Legge - "911ARTISTS, by asking for an example you appear to be of the belief that CIT has not lead witnesses."

Well, let's put it this way. I do not necessarily believe that there is no proof that CIT did not lead witnesses in their investigation. HA! A triple negative hypothesis! Try to figure that one out, Frank! I one-upped you, sir! Seriously, I don't know. However, the Chandler/Cole statement regarding witness leading appears to me to be not properly supported at this time. Thanks for your response. By the way, you used the word "we" instead of "I" above more than once. May I ask you who your speaking for other than yourself? Between dealing with DRG, PFT, and CIT I'm blown on this for a while. I'm taking some time off to work on my music and to watch a few movies to relax. I'm watching Apocalypse Now right now. Wow. The entire Elliot poem is on YouTube. Cool.

Peace,
Paul